On 2026-Oct-07, Kirill Reshke wrote: > Thanks for taking a look, LGTM then? I can send thus diff as .patch file if > you need one.
No need. I have pushed this to all branches, thanks for the bump. > AI-generated isolation test is too specific, reproducing this exact issue, > I don't think we need to include it. It doesn't provide usefull coverage > much. If we decide to nevertheless have test here - tell me, I will remove > AI bloat from spec. I didn't have much time to do a legwork here yet. Yeah, I agree it'd likely be too specific and unlikely to provide useful coverage. Did the test use an injection point? Thanks -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
