On Tue, 03 Nov 2026, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not crazy about this part though, I wonder if we should to put a hard cap > with a ... or something? I'll see what I can come up with.
We could try that, but then we have to figure out a good maximum, and that's difficult to do as there are only a few public validator implementations. What do you think about refactoring the function to use ArrayBuildState instead, that would be a slightly bigger chance but would result in cleaner code?
