On Thu, Nov 5, 2026 at 5:29 PM Richard Guo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Given the wrong results, I think we need to reconsider back-patching
> to v16.  Is fixing this in the back branches worth the risk of an ABI
> break?

I searched some open-source extensions and found several that allocate
their own PlannerInfo, such as TimescaleDB, HypoPG and pg_ivm, and
Apache AGE even passes one to flatten_join_alias_vars.  This close to
the minor releases, I didn't want to risk an ABI break, so I've pushed
it to master and v19 only.

(v16-v18 still give these wrong results silently, but I don't know
what to do about them for now.)

- Richard


Reply via email to