On Fri, 06 Nov 2026, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: > The attached .txt > (intentionally not a .diff or .patch since I didn't re-send your full > patchset) > massages your 0001 to make it more consistent with the rest of the > documentation.
Thanks, it looks good to me. > For v19 I don't see it as > a realistic change (and I think it was too late even when initially raised, > even though it was a lot earlier in the cycle than now), but hopefully we can > raise the bar in v20. Yes, when I originally submitted the thread I thought this was a bug/oversight as I didn't find any mention of it being intentional. Since it was intentional, it was definitely too late in June. I simply kept all 3 parts there so that they don't get forgotten, as I think 0003 should be a good improvement without breaking any use cases.
