On 1 November 2018 at 13:35, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2018/11/01 8:58, David Rowley wrote: >> On 1 November 2018 at 06:45, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I think a better way to shorten the name would be to truncate the >>> PartitionTupRouting() prefix in some way, e.g. dropping TupRouting. >> >> Thanks for chipping in on this. >> >> I agree. I don't think "TupRouting" really needs to be in the name. >> Probably "To" can also just become "2" and we can put back the >> Parent/Child before that. > > Agree that "TupRouting" can go, but "To" is not too long for using "2" > instead of it.
Okay. Here's a version with "2" put back to "To"... It's great to know the patch is now so perfect that we've only the macro naming left to debate ;-) -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
v12-0001-Speed-up-INSERT-and-UPDATE-on-partitioned-tables.patch
Description: Binary data