> Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> On 2018-11-03 10:12:14 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >>> One of my colleagues actually believed that if both "-M extended" and >>> "-M prepared" were specified, pgbench runs in mixture of those >>> modes. So I felt avoiding such misunderstanding is more important. > >> I regularly specify options multiple times, and I'd hate for that to not >> work anymore. It's really useful to set defaults for scripts that then >> can be overwritten by the caller by passing on "$@" (i.e. all script >> arguments). > > Yeah, there's an ancient tradition that "last switch wins" when receiving > conflicting command-line options. I think we should tread very carefully > in breaking that.
Yes, I think that is a fair argument. Proposal withdrawn. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
