>From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI [mailto:horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp]
>> This would cause some waste of memory on DSA because some partitions >> (buckets) >is allocated but not used. >> >> So I'm thinking that current dshash design is still ok but flexible >> size of partition is appropriate for some use cases like mine. >> >> Do you have any thoughts? > >We could do that easily, but shouldn't we find a way to reduce or eliminate >the impact >of locking first? dshash needs to hold partition lock while the caller is >examining a >returned entry. Thanks for the comment. I agreed. It would take a long time to achieve it but as you've pointed out finding way to minimize the locking time seems benefit for everyone and first priority. Regards, Takeshi Ideriha
