I wrote: > Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes: >> I'm inclined to fix this in hstoreUpgrade rather than complicate >> hstore_hash with historical trivia. Also there have been no field >> complaints - I guess it's unlikely that there is much pg 8.4 hstore data >> in the wild that anyone wants to hash.
> Changing hstoreUpgrade at this point seems like wasted/misguided effort. Oh, cancel that --- I was having a momentary brain fade about how that function is used. I agree your proposal is sensible. regards, tom lane