On 30/11/2018 17:58, Tom Lane wrote: > So we seem to be at an impasse here. By my count, three people have > expressed support for the patch's approach of adding a socket-directory > option, while two people seem to prefer the idea of putting pg_upgrade's > socket under /tmp (possibly with a way to override that). That's not > enough of a consensus to proceed with either approach, really, but > we ought to do something because the problem is real. > > Given that we have a patch for this approach, and no patch has been > offered for the /tmp approach, I'm kind of inclined to exercise > committer's discretion and proceed with this patch. Will anybody > be seriously annoyed if I do?
I think it's fair to proceed and leave open that someone submits a (possibly) better patch for a different approach in the future. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
