Greetings, * Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 08:46:08AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > I wonder if we maybe should have a regression test for every such > > function which just queries the catalog in a way to force the function > > to be called for every relation defined in the regression tests, to > > ensure that it doesn't segfault or throw an error.. > > Like sqlsmith? It looks hard to me to make something like that part of > the main regression test suite, as that's going to be costly and hard to > scale with.
No, I mean something like: with x as (select pg_partition_tree(relname) from pg_class) select 1 from x limit 1; or whatever it takes to make sure that the function is run against every entry in pg_class (or whatever is appropriate) while not returning the results (since we don't actually care about the output, we just want to make sure it doesn't ERROR or crash). sqlsmith, as I recall, doesn't care about ERROR cases, it's just looking for crashes, so it's not quite the same thing. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
