> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:05 AM Haribabu Kommi <kommi.harib...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I tried running the pgbench performance tests with minimal clients in my > laptop and I didn't > find any performance issues, may be issue is visible only with higher > clients. Even with > perf tool, I am not able to get a clear problem function. As you said, > combining of all changes > leads to some overhead.
Just out of curiosity I've also tried tpc-c from oltpbench (in the very same simple environment), it doesn't show any significant difference from master as well. > Here I attached the cumulative patches with further fixes and basic syntax > regress tests also. While testing the latest version I've noticed, that you didn't include the fix for HeapTupleInvisible (so I see the error again), was it intentionally? > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 2:55 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > FWIW, now that oids are removed, and the tuple table slot abstraction > got in, I'm working on rebasing the pluggable storage patchset ontop of > that. Yes, please. I've tried it myself for reviewing purposes, but the rebasing speed was not impressive. Also I want to suggest to move it from github and make a regular patchset, since it's already a bit confusing in the sense what goes where and which patch to apply on top of which branch.
