Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:23 PM Haribabu Kommi > <kommi.harib...@gmail.com> wrote: >> access/relation.[c|h] name is fine. Or how about access/rel.[c|h], >> because nodes/relation.h is related to planner. utils/rel.h is some how >> related to relation caches.
> Insofar as we can reasonably do so, I'd rather pick unique names for
> header files.
+1
regards, tom lane
