On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:08:52PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > While working on REINDEX CONCURRENTLY, I have noticed that > index_build() does not need its argument isprimary. Perhaps it is > not worth bothering, but for the REINDEX CONCURRENTLY business this > removes the need to open an index when triggering a concurrent > build. > > The flag was introduced in 3fdeb189, but f66e8bf actually forgot to > finish the cleanup as index_update_stats() has simplified its > interface.
And committed as of 289198c, and back to the real deal.. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
