On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 12:02:23PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:55:37AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> There's been talk periodically of having an aggressive triage effort > >> to try to sort through the pending patches and decide which ones have > >> no hope of making it to commit in the last CF. Then, if we just push > >> those off to the next cycle immediately and focus our attention on the > >> ones that do have a credible chance, we might get more of the latter > >> ones done. > > > The ones I am really worried about are the ones that keep getting > > delayed, e.g., CTE inlining, online checksums, multi-variate statistics. > > The only thing keeping me from committing CTE inlining today is doubt > about whether we have consensus on the syntax. Those other two I don't > know the status of.
I am thinking we should see which items we really want for PG 12 _now_ and allocate resources/help to get them done, rather than being surprised they didn't make it. I am glad we are in good shape with CTEs, since that has been a long-requested feature. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
