On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:50:27AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > I still think we should enforce one-or-more matching on the OWNER part as > well, > since matching zero would be a syntax error. There are more .* matches but > I’ve only touched the ones which match SQL, since there is a defined grammar > to > rely on there. The attached patch does that on top of your commit.
- regexp => qr/^COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres IS .*;/m, + regexp => qr/^COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres IS .+;/m, So... With what's on HEAD the current regex means that all these are correct commands: COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres is ; COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres is foo; COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres is foo; And for the first one that's obviously wrong. So what you are suggesting is to actually make the first pattern something to complain about, right? And ".+" this makes sure that at least one character is present, while for ".*" it is fine to have zero characters. What you are suggesting looks right if I understood that right. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
