On 2019-01-03 11:20, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> On 3 Jan 2019, at 10:39, Christoph Berg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Re: Peter Eisentraut 2019-01-02 >> <[email protected]> > >>> While we're considering the pg_regress output, what do you think about >>> replacing the ======... separator with a standard diff separator like >>> "diff %s %s %s\n". This would make the file behave more like a proper >>> diff file, for use with other tools. And it shows the diff options >>> used, for clarity. See attached patch. >> >> It will especially say which _alternate.out file was used, which seems >> like a big win. So +1. > > That has bitten more times than I’d like to admit, so definately +1 on being > explicit about that.
committed (This might be one of those rare times where one hopes for a buildfarm failure for verification. :-) ) -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
