On Feb 17, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Donald Dong <xd...@csumb.edu> wrote:
> 
> On Feb 17, 2019, at 10:56 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Perhaps, but refactoring to get that seems impractically invasive &
>> expensive, since e.g. index AM cost estimate functions would have to
>> be redefined, plus we'd have to carry around some kind of cost vector
>> rather than single numbers for every Path ...
> 
> Maybe we could walk through the final plan tree and fill the expression? With 
> another tree structure to hold the cost vectors.

Here is a draft patch. I added a new structure called CostInfo to the Plan 
node. The CostInfo is be added in create_plan, and the cost calculation is 
centered at CostInfo. Is this a reasonable approach?

Thank you,
Donald Dong

Attachment: 01_actual_cost_seqscan_001.patch
Description: Binary data


Reply via email to