On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 17:38, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 2019-02-26 12:57:14 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 12:19, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: > > I've put it as 256 args now. > > > > The overhead of that is about 2kB, so not really an issue. > > Why not just allocate it dynamically? Seems weird to have all these > MAX_ARGS, MAX_SCRIPTS ... commands. For me, its a few minutes work to correct a problem and report to the community. Dynamic allocation, run-time errors is all getting too time consuming for a small thing. > The eighties want their constants back ;) > Made me smile, thanks. ;-) -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
