On 2019-02-27 15:42:50 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 10:38:45PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > > Im not sure I understand. How can adding a memory context + reset to > > ctas and matview receivers negatively impact other dest receivers? > > I don't think you got my point here: imagine that a plugin use the > current receiveSlot logic from createas.c or matview.c, and forgets to > free the tuple copied. On v11, that works fine. On current HEAD, > they win silently a new leak.
The copy was made in intorel_receive()?