On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:52:52PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > If you're suggesting that we disable that security restriction > during extension creation, I really can't see how that'd be a > good thing ...
No, I don't mean that. I was just wondering if someone can set search_path within the SQL script which includes the extension contents to bypass the restriction and the error. They can always prefix such objects with pg_temp anyway if need be... -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
