On 03/01/19 17:34, Tom Lane wrote: > but I think it'd be fragile to use. (See the "Type Conversion" > chapter in the manual for the gory details, and note that domains > get smashed to their base types mighty readily.) > > Using custom operator names would work better/more reliably.
Or a new base type (LIKE float8) rather than a domain? Regards, -Chap
