On 2019-03-07 08:52:21 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 6:11 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > slot that's compatible with the "target" table. You can get compatible > > slot callbakcs by calling table_slot_callbacks(), or directly create one > > by calling table_gimmegimmeslot() (likely to be renamed :)). > > Hmm. I assume the issue is that table_createslot() was already taken > for another purpose, so then when you needed another callback you went > with table_givemeslot(), and then when you needed a third API to do > something in the same area the best thing available was > table_gimmeslot(), which meant that the fourth API could only be > table_gimmegimmeslot(). > > Does that sound about right?
It was 3 AM, and I thought it was hilarious...