Hi Peter, Imai-san, From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com] > Your changes in LOCALLOCK still refer to PGPROC, from your first version > of the patch. > > I think the reordering of struct members could be done as a separate > preliminary patch. > > Some more documentation in the comment before dlist_head LocalLocks to > explain this whole mechanism would be nice.
Fixed. > You posted a link to some performance numbers, but I didn't see the test > setup explained there. I'd like to get some more information on this > impact of this. Is there an effect with 100 tables, or do you need 100000? Imai-san, can you tell us the test setup? Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
0001-reorder-LOCALLOCK-structure-members-to-compact-the-s.patch
Description: 0001-reorder-LOCALLOCK-structure-members-to-compact-the-s.patch
0002-speed-up-LOCALLOCK-scan.patch
Description: 0002-speed-up-LOCALLOCK-scan.patch
