> I don't really understand what issue are we trying to solve here. > > Can someone describe a scenario where this (name of the binary not > clearly indicating it's related postgres) causes issues in practice? On > my system, there are ~1400 binaries in /usr/bin, and for the vast > majority of them it's rather unclear where do they come from. > > But it's not really an issue, because we have tools to do that > > 1) man > > 2) -h/--help > > 3) rpm -qf $file (and similarly for other packagers) > > 4) set --prefix to install binaries so separate directory (which some > distros already do anyway) > > So to me this seems like a fairly invasive change (potentially breaking > quite a few scripts/tools) just to address a minor inconvenience.
+1. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
