On 3/29/19 12:25 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 1:19 PM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com
<mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 6:27 AM David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net
<mailto:da...@pgmasters.net>> wrote:
> I used your suggestions with minor editing. After some reflection, I
> agree that the inline warnings are likely to be more effective than
> something at the end, at least for those working on a new
implementation.
I'm glad we could agree on something. Committed.
Me, too. Thanks!
Minor nitpick:
+ backup can only be taken on a primary and does not allow concurrent
+ backups. Moreover, because it writes a backup_label file on the
+ master, it can cause the master to fail to restart automatically after
Let's be consistent in if we call it a primary or a master, at least
within the same paragraph :)
Agreed, let's stick with "primary".
Are we planning to back-patch this? The deprecation was added to the
docs in 9.6 -- I think these clarifications would be helpful.
Thanks,
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net
