On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:39 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... Perhaps > that is an argument for putting the sync handler number *inside* the > FileTag, since we currently intend to do that with smgr IDs in > BufferTag (stealing space from ForkNumber).
Here is a version like that. I like it better this way, and the extra space can be clawed back by using 16 bit types to hold the fork number and sync handler number. Here again is the straw-man 0002 patch updated to show how it might look for another potential user. -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com
0001-Refactor-the-fsync-queue-for-wider-use-v16.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-Use-the-fsync-queue-for-SLRU-files-v16.patch
Description: Binary data
