On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 04:39:36AM +0000, Jamison, Kirk wrote: > I just checked and confirmed that the TCP USER TIMEOUT patch set v20 > works. Although you should capitalize "linux" to "Linux" as already > mentioned before. The committer can also just fix that very minor > part, if patch is deemed committable.
The first letter should be upper-case. > Note to committer: The "Ready for Committer" status is mainly intended for > tcp user timeout parameter. > > OTOH, unless there is consensus with the socket_timeout, > for now the socket_timeout patch status still remains as "Needs Review". I was looking at the patch set a couple of days ago. The proposed TCP_backend_v20.patch and TCP_interface_v20.patch make sense, but it seems to me that socket_timeout_v14.patch should be rejected as it could cause a connection to go down with no actual reason and that the server should be in charge of handling timeouts. Is my impression right? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
