>>> On 2019-03-29 20:32, Joe Conway wrote: >>>> pg_util <command> <options> >>> >>> How is that better than just renaming to pg_$oldname? >> >> As I already said in up thread: >> >>> This way, we would be free from the command name conflict problem > > Well, whatever we do -- if anything -- we would certainly need to keep > the old names around for a while somehow. So this doesn't really make > that issue go away.
Another complain was, it's hard to remember the tool names for novice users. I think this way would solve the problem. I agree that command name conflicting problem will not be solved by the idea. However I do not believe there's name conflicting problem in the first place. So I am happy to keep the old names as they are. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
