David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I'd say the fact that we populate reltablespace with 0 is a bug as
> it's not going to do what they want after a dump/restore.
Well, it's not really nice perhaps, but you cannot just put in some
other concrete tablespace OID instead. What a zero there means is
"use the database's default tablespace", and the point of it is that
it still means that after the DB has been cloned with a different
default tablespace. If we don't store 0 then we break
"CREATE DATABASE ... TABLESPACE = foo".
You could imagine using some special tablespace OID that has these
semantics (*not* pg_default, but some new row in pg_tablespace).
I'm not sure that that'd provide any functional improvement over
using zero, but we could certainly entertain such a change if
partitioned tables seem to need it.
regards, tom lane
