On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:30 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:57:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Anyway, this is *not* new in v12. > > Indeed. It seems to me that v12 makes the problem easier to appear > though, and I got to wonder if c6c9474 is helping in that as more > cases are popping up since mid-March.
Interesting, but I'm not sure how that could be though. Perhaps, a bit like the other thing that cropped up in the build farm after that commit, removing ~200ms of needless sleeping around an earlier online CHECKPOINT made some other pre-existing race condition more likely to go wrong. -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com
