On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:52 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > But the proposal is not to remove the _code_. The proposal is just to > remove that "#ifdef" lines that would make it conditionally compilable, > *if* the symbol that they test weren't always enabled. In other words, > turn it from "always compiled, but you can turn it off although nobody > does" into "always compiled".
Tom suggested that we might want to remove the code as an alternative. We have two almost-opposite proposals here. As I said, I think that the way that we think about or define developer options frames this discussion. -- Peter Geoghegan
