On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 12:00 PM Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 7:30 PM Alexander Korotkov > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Currently we amcheck supports lossy checking for missing parent > > downlinks. It collects bitmap of downlink hashes and use it to check > > subsequent tree level. We've experienced some large corrupted indexes > > which pass this check due to its looseness. > > Can you be more specific? What was the cause of the corruption? I'm > always very interested in hearing about cases that amcheck could have > detected, but didn't.
Ping? I am interested in doing better here. The background information seems very interesting. -- Peter Geoghegan
