Hi,
On 2019-05-13 13:21:33 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-May-13, Robert Haas wrote:
> > If that's the scenario, I'm not sure the smgrimmedsync() call is
> > sufficient. Suppose we log_smgrcreate() but then crash before
> > smgrimmedsync()... seems like we'd need to do them in the other order,
> > or else maybe just pass a flag to copy_file() telling it not to be so
> > picky.
>
> Well, if we do modify copy_file and thus we don't think the deletion
> step serves any purpose, why not just get rid of the deletion step
> entirely?
Well, it does serve a purpose:
/*
* We're in recovery, so unlogged relations may be trashed and
must be
* reset. This should be done BEFORE allowing Hot Standby
* connections, so that read-only backends don't try to read
whatever
* garbage is left over from before.
*/
but I'm somewhat doubtful that this logic is correct.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
