At Tue, 21 May 2019 14:31:32 +0900, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote in <20190521053132.gg1...@paquier.xyz> > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:55:59AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > Well, it's confusing that we're not consistent about which spellings > > are accepted. The GUC system accepts true/false, on/off, and 0/1, so > > it seems reasonable to me to standardize on that treatment across the > > board. That's not necessarily something we have to do for v12, but > > longer-term, consistency is of value. > > +1. > > Note: boolean GUCs accept a bit more: yes, no, tr, fa, and their upper > case flavors, etc. These are everything parse_bool():bool.c accepts > as valid values.
Yeah, I agree for longer-term. The opinion was short-term consideration on v12. We would be able to achieve full unification on sub-applications in v13 in that direction. (But I don't think it's good that apps pass-through options then server checkes them..) regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
