On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 06:35:31PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote: > The patch looks good to me.
Thanks for double-checking. I have applied and back-patched. The good thing here is that there were zero conflicts. > A bit of digging led me to the commit that removed databases and > tablespaces from pg_init_privs [0] and to a related thread [1]. IIUC > the problem is that using pg_init_privs for databases is complicated > by the ability to drop and recreate the template databases. I don't quite get this argument. If a user is willing to drop template1, then it is logic to also drop its initial privilege entries and recreate new ones from scratch. I think that this deserves a closer lookup. For tablespaces, we are limited by the ability of not sharing pg_init_privs? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature