>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes: >> My inclination is to fix this in the planner rather than the >> executor; there seems no good reason to actually hash a duplicate >> column more than once. Tom> Sounds reasonable --- but would it make sense to introduce some Tom> assertions, or other cheap tests, into the executor to check that Tom> it's not being given a case it can't handle? Oh definitely, I was planning on it. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
