Hi, On 2019-06-07 12:37:33 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > TableAmRoutine's index_build_range_scan thinks that parameter #8 is > called end_blockno, but table_index_build_range_scan and > heapam_index_build_range_scan and BRIN's summarize_range all agree > that it's the number of blocks to be scanned. I assume that this got > changed at some point while Andres was hacking on it and this one > place just never got updated.
Not sure where it came from :/ > Proposed patch attached. Since this seems like a bug, albeit a > harmless one, I propose to commit this to v12. Yea, please do! Greetings, Andres Freund
