‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 1:07 PM, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 1:53 PM pguser pgu...@diorite.uk wrote: > > If I apply the latest patch (which says 1 of 2? - maybe I'm missing a part > > of the patch?), I apply with > > Hi, > > First of all, thanks for evaluation! > No problem. I'd like to get involved in helping this patch mature as I think that we're suffering in a few areas of performance due to this. > Could you by any change provide also relations schema that were supposed to be > described by this command? Okay for now, it's not much. I get the issue of the SIGSEGV on a brand new database with only one relation: This is with the 12beta2 as compiled from git sources by me: psql (12beta2) Type "help" for help. db2=> \d List of relations Schema | Name | Type | Owner --------+------+-------+------- e5 | t1 | table | e5 (1 row) db2=> \d t1 Table "e5.t1" Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default --------+-------------------+-----------+----------+--------- n1 | smallint | | | n2 | smallint | | | c1 | character varying | | | c2 | character varying | | | Indexes: "i1" btree (n1, n2, c1) And with patch 20 applied: psql (12beta2) Type "help" for help. db2=> \d psql: server closed the connection unexpectedly This probably means the server terminated abnormally before or while processing the request. The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed. !> \q [postgres@ip-172-31-33-89 ~]$ . sql2 psql (12beta2) Type "help" for help. db2=> \d t1 psql: server closed the connection unexpectedly This probably means the server terminated abnormally before or while processing the request. The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed. !> \q In fact, if I do: createdb db3 psql -d db3 db3=# \d psql: server closed the connection unexpectedly This probably means the server terminated abnormally before or while processing the request. The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed. I get this on empty database with no relations yet defined. I feel I have done something silly or missed something when applying patch