On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 5:29 AM Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada...@nttcom.co.jp> wrote: > 17520|13599|postgres|16387|f|16387|scanning table|4425|4425 > 17520|13599|postgres|16387|f|16387|analyzing sample|0|0 > 17520|13599|postgres|16387|f|16387||0|0 <-- Is it Okay??
Why do we zero out the block numbers when we switch phases? The CREATE INDEX progress reporting patch does that kind of thing too, and it seems like poor behavior to me. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
