On 2019-07-13 17:13, Fabien COELHO wrote: >>> What about avoiding a redirection with something like: >>> >>> Datum (* const pg_random_uuid)(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) = gen_random_uuid; >> >> That seems very confusing. > > Dunno. Possibly. The user does not have to look at the implementation, and > probably such code would deserve a comment. > > The point is to avoid one call so as to perform the same (otherwise the > pg_random_uuid would be slightly slower), and to ensure that it behaves > the same, as it would be the very same function by construction. > > I've switched the patch to ready anyway.
committed -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
