Hi David, On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:40:59PM +1200, David Rowley wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 19:35, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: >> This has been reverted as of f5db56f, still it seems to me that this >> was moving in the right direction. > > I've pushed this again, this time with the cleanup code done in the > right order.
I have spent some time lately analyzing f7c830f as I was curious about the logic behind it, and FWIW the result looks good. Thanks! -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
