Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-Jul-22, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I nearly missed the need for that because of all the noise that
>> check-world emits in pre-v12 branches. We'd discussed back-patching
>> eb9812f27 at the time, and I think now it's tested enough that doing
>> so is low risk (or at least, lower risk than the risk of not seeing
>> a failure). So I think I'll go do that now.
> I'd like that, as it bites me too, thanks.
Done. The approach "make check-world >/dev/null" now emits the
same amount of noise on all branches, ie just
NOTICE: database "regression" does not exist, skipping
The amount of parallelism you can apply is still pretty
branch-dependent, unfortunately.
regards, tom lane
