Hi, I have rebased the patch and currently reviewing the patch on master (1e2fddfa33d3c7cc93ca3ee0f32852699bd3e012).
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 4:45 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:12 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I start looking at the patch, there is a couple of problems with the > patch. The first one is the OID conflict, which I fixed on my machine. The > second problem is assertion failure. I think you have not compiled the > PostgreSQL code with the assertion. > > Hi Peter, > > Looks like there was some good feedback for this WIP project last time > around. It's currently in "Needs Review" status in the July > Commitfest. To encourage more review and see some automated compile > and test results, could we please have a fresh rebase? The earlier > patches no longer apply. > > Thanks, > > -- > Thomas Munro > https://enterprisedb.com > -- Ibrar Ahmed
001_temporal_query_processing_with_range_types_v4.patch
Description: Binary data
