On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 11:13 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Right. Besides, adding something along the lines Michael described > > necessitates fixing the problems that it creates. We'll run out of > > blocks of 5 contiguous OIDs (or whatever) far sooner than we'll run > > out of single OIDs. > > Well, if we ever get even close to that situation, this whole approach > isn't really gonna work.
My point was that I don't see any reason to draw the line at or after what Michael suggested, but before handling the exhaustion of available blocks of 5 contiguous OIDs in the range 8000-9999. It's just busy work. -- Peter Geoghegan
