Greetings, * Michael Banck (michael.ba...@credativ.de) wrote: > Independently of the whitelist/blacklist question, I believe > pg_checksums should not error out as soon as it encounters a weird looking > file, but either (i) still checksum it or (ii) skip it? Or is that to be > considered a pilot error and it's fine for pg_checksums to fold?
imv, random files that we don't know about are exactly 'pilot error' to be complained about.. This is exactly why the whitelist idea falls over. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
