Hi Hosoya-san,
I am sorry for so late to reply to you. I merged the patches into master(commit: 44460d7017cde005d7a2e246db0b32375bfec15d). I tested the case I used in the previous patches and didn't find any issues. Now I find that you are rethinking some of the details. I will continue to pay attention to this and will follow up and feedback in time. Regards, -- Shawn Wang ---- On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:34:13 +0800 yuzuko <yuzukohos...@gmail.com> wrote ---- Hello, On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 1:45 PM yuzuko <mailto:yuzukohos...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Shawn, Alvaro, > > Thank you for testing patches and comments. > Yes, there are two patches: > (1) v4_default_partition_pruning.patch fixes problems with default > partition pruning > and (2) v3_ignore_contradictory_where_clauses_at_partprune_step.patch > determines > if a given clause contradicts a sub-partitioned table's partition constraint. > I'll post two patches together next time. > > Anyway, I'll rebase two patches to apply on master and fix space. > Attach the latest patches discussed in this thread. I rebased the second patch (v5_ignore_contradictory_where_clauses_at_partprune_step.patch) on the current master. Could you please check them again? -- Best regards, Yuzuko Hosoya NTT Open Source Software Center
