[ returning to this topic now that the CF is over ]
I wrote:
> Perhaps there's an argument for doing something to change the behavior
> of list_union and list_difference and friends. Not sure --- it could
> be a foot-gun for back-patching. I'm already worried about the risk
> of back-patching code that assumes the new semantics of list_concat.
> (Which might be a good argument for renaming it to something else?
> Just not list_union, please.)
Has anyone got further thoughts about naming around list_concat
and friends?
If not, I'm inclined to go ahead with the concat-improvement patch as
proposed in [1], modulo the one improvement David spotted.
regards, tom lane
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6704.1563739...@sss.pgh.pa.us
