On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 04:15:24AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote: > From: Michael Paquier [mailto:mich...@paquier.xyz] >> Imagine an application which relies on Postgres, still does *not* start >> it as a service but uses "pg_ctl start" >> automatically. This could be triggered as part of another service startup >> which calls say system(), or as another script. Wouldn't that cause >> potentially a freeze? > > Do you mean by "another service startup": > > another service (Windows service) > -> an application (not a Windows service) > -> pg_ctl start > > Then pg_ctl runs under the Windows service environment, and the > popup won't appear.
Yes, I meant a pg_ctl start command invoked as par of another service startup in the way you describe it here. >> I am also not sure that I quite understand why a >> popup would never show up if a different service startup triggers pg_ctl >> start by itself that fails. > > I experimented it with a sample program that I showed in this > thread. A program invoked by a Windows services also runs in the > service. Okay, so this means that the service state of the parent is inherited and that we can rely on that. I was not sure about that. Got it now. Now, there are cases where it is possible to start an app without using a service though, no? For example using the task manager it is possible to trigger an app when the OS starts. What happens in the case where we have an app which starts Postgres using "pg_ctl start" as part of its startup process but it fails and pops an error window, freezing the whole? Can this happen? Sorry to sound noisy, but I am rather scared of the potential consequences of this change without a GUC to control it as Craig mentioned at the beginning of the thread. Perhaps that's a niche case, but it could be annoying for some users. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
