On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 12:36 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2019-Aug-06, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > > Revised patch is attached. Changes to \dA+ command are reverted. It > > also contains some minor improvements. > > > > Second patch looks problematic for me, because it provides index > > description alternative to \d+. IMHO, if there is something really > > useful to display about index, we should keep it in \d+. So, I > > propose to postpone this. > > Are you saying that we should mark this entire CF entry as Returned with > Feedback? Or do you see a subset of your latest 0001 as a commitable > patch?
Still hope to commit 0001. Please, don't mark RFC for now. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
