On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:52:28PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: > I think Heikki was asking about places with a lot of sub-contexts, which a > completely different issue. It used to be the case that some aggregates > created a separate context for each group - like array_agg. That would > make Jeff's approach to accounting rather inefficient, because checking > how much memory is used would be very expensive (having to loop over a > large number of contexts).
The patch has been marked as ready for committer for a week or so, but it seems to me that this comment has not been addressed, no? Are we sure that we want this method if it proves to be inefficient when there are many sub-contexts and shouldn't we at least test such scenarios with a worst-case, customly-made, function? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
